Last week, ICANN ruled in favour of allowing customized top-level domains. It estimates that these new properties will cost upwards from $100,000 - thought the cost will definitely come down with time. Soon, we might be seeing things like .vancouver, .map, .food and .hiking - and the numerous sub-domains associated with these TLDs.

This decision effectively ends the debate about the usefulness of .mobi. dotMobi describes itself as “the gTLD dedicated to users who access the Internet through their mobile phones.” It’s unrealistic to expect that out of hundreds new TLDs users are supposed to only trust .mobi sites for mobile access. Every site on every top-level domain should be mobile-friendly.

I really respect the technology that the dotMobi foundation has developed - we use DeviceAtlas at Handi, for instance. I believe .mobi sites are still useful for hosting services that are purely focused at the mobile context - location-sensitive websites, for instance. However, the battle for large-scale deployment of general purpose content in that TLD seems to be over before it even began.


Last week I had the opportunity to spend the day with other mobile researchers at the semi-annual Nokia University Relations Forum here in Vancouver. Nokia’s Vancouver group (developers of the N96, among other interesting new devices) hosts the event every year in June and December and researchers from around BC participate, sharing the latest on their research activities.

Nokia also provided a bit of insight into their thinking and directions to the future. Nothing “off the record,” but it is still nice to get the update from a real person rather than gleaned from various rumour and news sites. The essence of the update from Nokia was that their business is big and getting bigger, that the multimedia segment is growing quickly, that the competition from RIM’s Blackberry and Apple’s iPhone is actually helping Nokia by getting people to consider a “smartphone.”

We also saw a bit of a demo of the N96, which although not released has been announced, and I got to play with the one being carried by the fellow sitting next to me - the TV reception (Nokia runs a local version of DVB-H inside the building) was crisp and clear and the phone itself is a nice evolution of the N95 that preceded it.

The research presentations ranged from the extremely technical (e.g., a mathematical / theoretical analysis of the effects of signal propagation along the surface of the body [related research from Ireland]), to the applied (heart and other body function monitoring tools that can be connected wirelessly to a phone, and a radio signal analysis vehicle recently purchased by UBC). There was a description of research into message passing between mobile vehicles (sort of a “moving mesh”), and a couple of student projects including a “Guitar Hero” clone for the N810 written by two students from University of Victoria.

Several presentations looked at the way mobiles are used in computer science and engineering education, and one demonstrated remote teaching techniques for a mobile and wireless engineering course.

Nokia donates a small number of handsets and some cash as well to help these projects along, but they are largely funded either through bigger grants from NSERC and others or from the researcher’s own passion and interest in the field.

MobileMUSE’s David Vogt made a short presentation on that project’s latest round of activities and he encouraged local researchers to get involved with the project through their prototype development fund.

All in all it was a fascinating look at what is going on in mobile research locally. There is a lot more than you think, and it is clear - as the Nokia managers were proud to point out - that we researchers often don’t know about each other unless we come to this event.

My own work on the user experience of rich media mobile devices was not on the agenda this time - I presented at the last meeting, in December 2007 - but I hope to present again in the upcoming one in December 2008.

The other day I was unpacking a brand new N82, courtesy of Richard and Nokia. One of the most visible changes from the N95 model is the out-of-the-box behaviour of the N82 accelerometer - display switches from upright to landscape quite often. GPS got better too - advanced sensors in mobiles are clearly the new norm. It’s apparent that soon our devices will know a lot more about the mobile context than they ever did.

On the other end of device spectrum, my father just bought a brand new DSLR camera and he’s getting better and better at it. It takes great pictures if used properly. I can’t see the mobile ever completely eradicating the DLSR niche market. Or the portable media player market (screen size matters). Mobiles are becoming getting better at doing many things at once, but of course won’t ever be as good as dedicated devices.

That said, I am spoiled. I want all of my devices to be context sensitive. My mobile. My DSLR. My home theater. My fridge and even my microwave. Researchers in academia call this ubiquitous computing and place its arrival to some point decades in the future. However, it doesn’t have to be so complicated.

Mobiles should share the context information collected from all their sensors with every other personal device. The DSLR might not have a GPS, but if I carried a mobile it can derive the location based on the time when a photo was taken. My fridge should notice that I invited a bunch of friends over for pasta by SMS, but forgot to buy the sauce.

Who or what should be driving the specification for this kind of context-sharing standard?

followbreakIs twitter the latest thing? Or is it an ancient thing, writ new? I argue the latter.

I was reading a blog post (after randomly finding it on a twitter feed that I don’t follow but a friend does - how’s that for indirect links?) and someone analyzed (and self deprecated) his twittering, inspired, it seems, by “an “e-card he had seen.

A visitor (friend of his, perhaps) posted a comment, asking why all the interest in twitter? He also noted that hardly anyone in the general public was twittering, but then wondered if the whole world would soon be reduced to 5 word snips of conversation.

I was initially provoked by the non sequiter in the comment (since, if no-one is doing it, how would the “whole world” be affected?) but then thought a bit more. What is it about twitter?

The first and easiest explanation is that twitter is just SMS (short message service, for the mobile/cell-challenged) but remade for the web. And, in fact, many people use their cell phone and SMS messages to the service to post “tweets” as they are called.

Fewer read twitter postings on their phone, although it is possible, either by visiting the site on a mobile browser (try http://m.twitter.com) or having them directed into your phone as SMS messages.

But having it on your phone is dangerous and expensive if you follow a lot of people and don’t have a plan that includes a LOT of messages (check out this post about the true cost of SMS, which is zero to the provider and atrocious on a per bit basis to the customer, but that’s another story…).

In terms of the worries about this affecting literary skills all over the globe, the commenter answers his own question. No, the future will not be reduced to 5 word sentences, since not everyone or everything is a tweet. And many people AREN’T doing it.

And even if they were, as I will argue below, that’s what conversations are all about and that hasn’t reduced us to imbeciles (yet).

But think of it this way - almost the entire world IS sending text messages on their phones (3.3 billion phones at latest count). Latest estimates have 8 billion messages being sent every single day.

It can be argued that Twitter is a web-based adaptation of SMS (including the zany character limit). The service is well suited to the “sitting at my computer all day with an internet connection and the ability to define my own productivity/activity” type of person. In other words, bloggers and other cube-nerds.

But that begs the question of “what is it about SMS“? Why the popularity?

For them (ahem, us), twitter is the chit chat that regular people get while they are working.

Ever spend any time on a road crew or a construction gang or working in a hair dressing salon or a restaurant? The “twittering” (i.e., short snippets of socializing) is constant.

Twitter isn’t a new form of communication, it is a new technology that facilitates a very old form of communication. The background gossip, views, opinions, observations that you utter while you work and that help pass the day and keep you in sync with your fellow human beings.

And unlike SMS, it is free. Free in the sense that matters today: it doesn’t get more expensive the more you use it and it doesn’t require an incremental investment. In other words, you can use what you already have at hand. Like conversation.

So, twitter isn’t a revolution, it is human communication at its most basic form. But it is different:

  • it is global, which nattering while you dig a ditch never was
  • it is archived, which hair salon gossip never should be
  • it is hypermediated with links to photos, videos, and web sites in a way that you certainly can’t do while you serve up a no fat latte or fries with that.
  • it is searchable in real time (see the phenomenon of twemes.com, as an example), which means the cacophony can be filtered.

Oh yes. There is something to Twitter, all right. It is both foundational and inherent to humans in that it is conversations and at the same time building on those desires and practices and enabling them with 21st century abilities.

We all agree that Twitter is amazing, Jaiku is great in its own context-sensitive way and Ontario-based Plurk is a horizontal breath of fresh air. Yet, fragmentation of audiences on these microblogging sites is a problem - your friends might not be following you on the one that you prefer, plus interesting people are generally hard to find.

So let’s assume that ten years into the future, an open service just like Twitter becomes a standard and even gets a dedicated button on your mobile. Your friends and family are following you, more than that - industry experts and top local bloggers are automatically added to your stream (they’ve got lots to say!). This service even senses “tweets” in your immediate locale, so you can see what people think about events and venues you’re in.

What would life be like with this kind of service?

For one, it would let us have more friends (but not close friends). In a situation when key events in your life are immediately known to your social circle, keeping in touch would stop being an active task. Instead, we would simply provide feedback to events that happen to people that are important to us.

Citizen journalism would start being simply journalism. The term “news story” would refer to a fast-spreading meme, where anyone could be the reporter.

It would be extremely easy to single out people known as connectors by analyzing the patterns of information spreading - everyone would be on the grid.

Every event would have an informal backchannel, where opinions could be exchanged in real-time. This would put more pressure on performers, as even the slightest mishaps would be noticed and shared.

What else?

I joked with Igor recently that the discussion about the “twitterverse” being aware of the China quake early because of a *lack* of postings from that area was like the “disturbance in the force” comments in Star Wars movies.

force

I am not the first to report on such things, as a quick google search turns up “disturbance in the force” comments dating back a year or more and as recently as this past May.

I think this sort of “global” consciousness (which is, I suppose, a preliminary version of “galactic consciousness”) is something we’re seeing more and more of.

It can only get more precise and ubiquitous with mobile versions. SMS and MMS are interesting but as “dyadic” communication they are slow to propagate and subject to much higher error rate and degradation over time.

Many to many media, like twitter/blogs, provide a platform for “group-forming” software (see David Weinberger’s 2001 interview with David Reed for details on the math/impact of network effects as they are affected by group-forming) and the resulting explosion of network value.

The discussion about memes being ubiquitous and there being many inventors of most inventions (as Gladwell has reported) also figures into this discussion, I believe. As does Surowiecki’s writing on the Wisdom of Crowds).

Anyway, the whole business came alive for me again this morning when I saw a post for a new bit of software called Moody or Not. Take a look at that, and imagine a mobile version, helping you keep up-to-date - and helping you contribute to that global stream of consciousness - in a ubiquitous way. The power of feedback is part of the solution, but as Reed’s Law makes apparent and Seb’s corrollary clarifies, software that enables/makes easy group-forming is the key to adding value by linking people.

PS: For more on the Twitterverse and the quake, see also the online journalism blog and Ingram’s piece in the Globe and Mail.

Igor’s tag line for this blog is mobile commentary based on facts. And yet, where are the facts in my most recent posts? They seem more like commentaries, to be honest. I shall attempt to rectify that in a new series, beginning with this post. First, some background.

My research is in the broad area of “technology and society” and I have had a long-standing interest in mobile technology and the mobile information society. As part of that work, I have had to good fortune of working with the design group at Nokia, here in Vancouver.

Not many people know that Nokia has operations in Vancouver, and I think they are happy with that situation. They do handset design in their Burnaby offices (notably the “N” series of phones) and game design in their Richmond office (most notably for the N-Gage platform, which was not a rousing success out of the gate as a special device a few years ago but is getting a fresh launch as a component in the regular handsets).

The University Research program at Nokia is a wonderful way for researchers to do pure and applied research in collaboration with one of the leaders of mobile technologies. Some of the research is very technical, with radio engineering and computer programming professors from Universities around BC participating. Our work is more at the social and of things and has focused on user experience with so-called “rich media” mobile phones.

In order to pursue this angle on phones, and not just do the usual “techno anthropologist” stuff, we’ve developed a new approach that is built upon media theory rather than anthropology or ethnography. We’ve been calling it “techno experiential design assessment” (in part because of the cool acronym, TEDA).

Next post - research results from our first study of living with a rich media mobile device (e.g., “smart phone”).

Every year, leading mobile designers from around the world meet at an event called MEX. The Mobile User Experience Conference is a great way to discuss the challenges that exist in the industry and more importantly, to brainstorm solutions.

This year MEX is happening in London and although MobScure is not attending, we’ve been keeping an eye on the conference proceedings. The MEX Manifesto is released every year, outlining the top trends in mobile. Take a look and in case you have an interest in mobile software development, make sure to tackle at least one of them!

  1. Content itself will be the interface of the future
  2. Handsets are no longer just for the hand
  3. Fragmentation is the enemy of innovation
  4. Fashion is a stronger motivator than functionality
  5. The developing world is the new frontier for mobile user experience
  6. Search requires a radically different approach in the mobile environment
  7. Intelligent contact lists are the future centres of the user interface
  8. Mobile payments herald the next generational shift
  9. Users as individuals: uniquely complex and contradictory
  10. The potential of smart voice

Read the manifesto (PDF)

We were given the opportunity to do a small ethnographic study last fall, looking at the uptake of rich media mobile devices (a “smartphone” to most people…).

The study design, as originally conceived, was to look at the viability of replacing the standard UI on a phone - in this case the Nokia N95 - with a set of “widset” applications. We wanted to see if people could “live” in the mobile web, at least their life that involved mobile devices.

In Canada, if you want to do work like this you have to subsidize the use of data plans, because of the insane pricing (although it is getting better, I know). Last fall, however, we had no choice but to provide people with a $100 incentive to use their phone for internet applications. If we didn’t we knew that we wouldn’t get any results at all, since they just wouldn’t touch the mobile web for fear of bankrupting themselves.

We divided our participants into four groups: we had two groups with an assigned task and two groups with no assigned task. Two of the groups had a widset interface and two of the groups had the “normal” interface to the phone. So we had four “cells” in a two by two matrix:

widsetsandtasks

The plan was to have the four groups come in, pick up a phone and have a short discussion (where they would learn the objectives of the study, the basic operations of the phone, and how to use the widsets if applicable). The groups with a “task” would also have some time to talk about their task, but they were expected to coordinate their activity using their mobile phones. They had a week with the phones, then brought them back and had another discussion/focus group and then we repeated the experiment.

Some preliminary observations:

A week isn’t enough time. People were just getting used to the phones at that point. I can commiserate. Unless you have spent a lot of time changing phones (as I do, and probably other mobscure readers do), then you might not appreciate how disruptive a new phone can be. These are not like rental cars, where you jump in and know what everything does - more or less - the minute you start it up. They are personal devices, subject to intense personalization, and take a while to configure the way you want them to. They are also complex (even the “widset” group had to navigate the Nokia interface which they may or may not have been familiar with). Speaking of ‘configure,” our second finding was related to the extent to which people will start configuring, even when you don’t want them to:

People hack the phones, no matter what you tell them. We asked the groups with the widset interface to leave it alone. They didn’t. Plain and simple. In fact, we noticed that people started customizing the phones almost immediately when we passed them out in the first focus group. Some “hacks” were minor - changing the ring tone etc - and some were completely understandable, like adding in your contacts. But some users went way beyond that, downloading music, installing custom applications, fiddling with the colours and icons. In a sense this is natural, given how personal a phone is and we know from previous research that a phone is one of the most personal gadgets around.

People didn’t use the widsets. Although we asked people to use them, people were on their own for a week and we didn’t have control over their actions. When they brought the phones back they clearly hadn’t used the widset interface, and told us so in the focus groups. I don’t know if the supplied widsets weren’t compelling enough, but clearly this is still early days for web applications on handsets. The iPhone seems to be making some progress in this regard, and Nokia’s Widset site (widsets.com) which had quiet for a while, announced a new round of beta testing starting May 6.

Tasks inspire creativity. We asked people to tell us what they did with their phones, how they used them in new ways, given the advanced capabilities and data subsidy. What we found was that the groups that we left on their own didn’t change their habits (much) despite urging them to try out the new features on the phones. Those people we gave a challenge to used the features extensively, including some of the more “Exotic” ones, like location awareness and video sharing. It seems that a task inspires creativity (necessity is the mother of invention?) and left on their own people slide back into old habits.

Interestingly, some of the participants blogged about their experience:

Rebecca (”Miss604″): http://www.miss604.com/2007/10/the-nokia-n95-taste-test.html

Richard (”sillygwailo”): http://justagwailo.com/2007/10/03/n95

Roland, another participant, posted two items: a “blink” (first day) reaction, and a sober second day post.

We’ll be following up this research with some “mobile natives” this coming summer, giving a smaller group of people, who are more familiar with the technology, a longer time to use multimedia mobile devices. I’ll report back here with the results.

…r

Voice 2.0
Igor Faletski | May 25, 2008

“Yeah, sure… Can you please text me your email?” said the girl next to me. She was talking on her mobile for about ten minutes during the SkyTrain ride and needed to wrap up just as we were heading into the tunnel following the Stadium station.

Why is it necessary to invoke multiple means of communication right in the middle of an active conversation?

Voice calls are great. They are real-time and carry a lot of information, in words and intonations. Yet, they are analogue and lack the link to the digital world. When we have to request a file or a URL it’s easier to turn to an all-digital medium like e-mail. Because of cost and usability matters, texting often acts as an intermediary between the mobile and the web. This multi-modal approach works - but it doesn’t have to be that difficult.

John had an excellent idea - record every call and convert its contents into text. There is some use to simply having a transcript of things you’ve said, but the interesting consequences arise from having a computer analyze the conversation in real-time:

  1. When the mobile hears the word “file” and the contents description it can reasonably well establish what document is being discussed a-la OSX SpotLight (assuming a link to a storage cloud)
  2. Names spoken in the call can be mapped to names from the address book with reasonable accuracy
  3. Actions and dates are also quite clear in verbal exchanges (”send”, “tomorrow”, “spreadsheet”).

The beauty of it is, all the technology required is already there - someone simply has to put it all together. Us?

In other news, MobScure received the post of the week award at the current Carnival of the Mobilists (thank you!). Head to Symbiano-Tek for this week’s best mobile blogs from around the world.

 



Meta
RDF | RSS | Atom 0.3

mobscure :: obscure trends of mobile is proudly powered by Wordpress 2.5 and Squible Beta 2.
All content is copyrighted by its author[s].